Book Reviews

Abstract

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes 1. C.A. Crocker, Engaging failing states. Foreign affairs, (82) 5, 35. See also, J.M. Weinstein, J.E. Porter and S.E. Eizenstat, eds., 2004. On the brink: weak states and U.S. national security: a report of the Commission for Weak States and US National Security. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution and the Center for Global Development, 12–13. 2. Afghanistan Study Group, 2008. Report: revitalizing our efforts rethinking our strategies. Washington, DC: Center for the Study of the Presidency, 30 January. 3. For example, Lt Col R.A. Millen, 2005. Afghanistan: Reconstituting a Collapsed State. Carlisle: Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College. 1. See, for instance, M. Ignatieff, 2003. Empire lite: nation-building in Bosnia, Kosovo and Afghanistan. London: Vintage; and M. Ethrington, 2005. Revolt on the Tigris: the Al-Sadr uprising and the governing of Iraq. London: Hurst & Co. 2. For a similar argument regarding the demise of pluralism in the post-cold war period, see G. Simpson, 2004. Great powers and outlaw states: unequal sovereignty in the international legal order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3. R.H. Jackson, 1990. Quasi-states: sovereignty, international relations and the third world. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 4. S. Krasner, 1999. Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. Chichester: Princeton University Press. 5. Gerald Knaus and Felix Martin, 2003. Lessons from Bosnia and Herzegovina: travails of the European Raj. Journal of democracy, 14 (3), 60–74. 1. See, for instance, N.J. Wheeler, 2000. Saving strangers: humanitarian intervention in international society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; and J.L. Holzgrefe and R.O. Keohane, eds, 2003. Humanitarian intervention: ethical, legal, and political dilemmas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2. See further, F.M. Deng et al., 1996. Sovereignty as responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. 3. An exception is the 2001 ICISS Report, The responsibility to protect: report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre. Although this report implies that a duty of humanitarian intervention exists, it does not employ the terminology of duty as such. 4. See O. O'Neill, 1986. Faces of hunger. London: Allen and Unwin, 101. 5. M. Anderson, 1999. Do no harm: how aid can support peace – or war. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. 1. D. Harvey, 2003. The new imperialism. New York: Oxford University Press.