Abstract
Janek Wasserman's Marginal Revolutionaries is not so much an intellectual history of Austrian scholarship as a sociological history of a group of scholars who were initially united by geography and eventually were influential in many international research and policy institutions. While the book contains an interesting social narrative of the Austrian school, it falls short in its general economic understanding. A mischaracterization of the Methodenstreit and a serious misunderstanding of Wieser mar the book, as does a politicized ad hominem in the conclusion.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
