Abstract
Humans are thought to possess a unique proclivity to share with others – including strangers. This puzzling phenomenon has led many to suggest that sharing with strangers originates from human-unique language, social norms, warfare and/or cooperative breeding. However, bonobos, our closest living relative, are highly tolerant and, in the wild, are capable of having affiliative interactions with strangers. In four experiments, we therefore examined whether bonobos will voluntarily donate food to strangers. We show that bonobos will forego their own food for the benefit of interacting with a stranger. Their prosociality is in part driven by unselfish motivation, because bonobos will even help strangers acquire out-of-reach food when no desirable social interaction is possible. However, this prosociality has its limitations because bonobos will not donate food in their possession when a social interaction is not possible. These results indicate that other-regarding preferences toward strangers are not uniquely human. Moreover, language, social norms, warfare and cooperative breeding are unnecessary for the evolution of xenophilic sharing. Instead, we propose that prosociality toward strangers initially evolves due to selection for social tolerance, allowing the expansion of individual social networks. Human social norms and language may subsequently extend this ape-like social preference to the most costly contexts.
Highlights
One of the most puzzling human behaviors from an evolutionary perspective is our species’ propensity to share with nonrelatives and even strangers [1,2]
The results of experiment 2 further support the idea that sharing was voluntary, prosocial and xenophilic
Subjects’ behavior suggests door-opening was not caused by a lack of inhibitory control, because subjects opened doors according to the identity of the recipient not just the presence of a conspecific
Summary
One of the most puzzling human behaviors from an evolutionary perspective is our species’ propensity to share with nonrelatives and even strangers [1,2]. A number of experiments have shown that a variety of primates will even help another individual obtain food when there is no immediate, tangible reward for their help (chimpanzees: [4,23,24,25,26,27]; old world monkeys: [28]; new world monkeys: [29,30,31]). This type of prosociality suggests in some contexts primates have other-regarding motivations (but see critique of this interpretation by [9]). Designing such an experiment for most primate species would be extremely difficult given the high potential for stress, injury and aggression
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.