Bone Transport through Induced Membrane versus Conventional Bone Transport in Management of Infected long bone defects of Lower Limbs: a randomized controlled trial.

Abstract

To compare bone transport through induced membrane (BTM) and conventional bone transport (BT) regarding docking site union and infection recurrence in management of infected long bone defects. prospective randomized controlled study. tertiary level center. 30 patients with infected non-united long bone fractures of lower limbs. 15 patients treated by BTM in group (A) and 15 patients treated by BT in group (B). External fixation time (EFT), External fixation index (EFI), Docking time (DT). Bone and functional outcomes evaluated by the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system. Postoperative complications evaluated according to Paley's classification. The mean docking time (DT) was significantly lower in BTM group in comparison to BT group (3.6 ± 0.82 months vs 4.8 ± 0.86 months respectively; P value 0.001). Docking site non-union and infection recurrence were significantly lower in BTM group in comparison to BT group (0% vs 40%; P value 0.02 and 0% vs 33.3%; P value 0.04 respectively) with no significant difference in EFI (P value 0.08). This is the first prospective randomized controlled study comparing BTM and BT techniques showing that BTM had significantly faster docking site union, lower incidence of postoperative complications including docking site non-union and infection recurrence rates and lower number of additional procedures needed at the expense of two staged operation in comparison to BT.