Abstract

Drawing on the case law of CJEU and ECHR, I will criticize the European practice of bone testing for migrants. The test is currently employed in order to determine the age of individuals, which is a discriminating factor for the application of a number of rules affecting the fate of the migrant. I will argue that regarding the scientific unreliability of this practice and its danger for the health, bone tests constitute a violation of the right to private life – within Union law and the case law of the supervisory bodies of the council of Europe.

Highlights

  • Arriving in Europe as a minor or as an adult changes radically the fate of a migrant

  • Drawing on the case law of CJEU and ECHR, I will criticize the European practice of bone testing for migrants

  • The test is currently employed in order to determine the age of individuals, which is a discriminating factor for the application of a number of rules affecting the fate of the migrant

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Arriving in Europe as a minor or as an adult changes radically the fate of a migrant. Being over or under the legal age of maturity determines the help that will be granted to the migrant upon arrival. Exact age is hard to measure if no birthdate is available, and even harder to prove in front of a judge. This age has to be clearly determined in order to evaluate the protection that will be granted to a migrant. The states developed the bone test technology in order to assess the age of these persons. This practice has been commonly used in Europe for decades

AMSTERDAM LAW FORUM
SUMMER ISSUE
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.