Abstract
<h3>To the Editor.—</h3> The comments of Freeman et al (235:1965, 1976) concerning Loeffler's interpretation of bone scintigrams (234:1228, 1975) are soundly based and can be supported from the many clinical reports that have appeared in the literature, with one exception. I would suggest that their comments with regard to the clinical significance of the degree of renal uptake of<sup>99m</sup>Tc phosphate complexes is open to criticism. It has been implied that poor kidney visualization on the skeletal scintigram indicates an enhanced uptake of polyphosphate complex in the skeleton due to the presence of a diffuse pathological process. If this were so, then in the case of a patient with highly active multiple skeletal metastases, such as may occur with prostatic or breast cancer, one would also expect to observe decreased renal activity, but in practice this is not so. Conversely, in cases of reduced skeletal uptake, for instance where
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.