Abstract

Diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) is usually challenging. In this context, we have attempted to employ data derived from automated analysis of bone marrow (BM) samples as an ancillary tool for the discrimination between reactive marrow and MDS. A total of 101 BM anticoagulated samples referred for flow cytometry (FCM) analysis on the clinical suspicion of MDS had been previously counted in a Mindray BC-6800 hematology analyzer (testing set). Among them, 22/101 randomly selected BM samples (comparison set) had been also simultaneously counted by an Advia 2120 and a CELL-DYN Sapphire hematology analyzer. Selected parameters obtained by Mindray BC-6800 were retrospectively evaluated with ROC and regression analysis in an attempt to formulate a discriminative scoring system (SS) for MDS. This system was further evaluated in the comparison set. The diagnosis of MDS was established in 37/101 patients assessed ("MDS" group). Three patients were diagnosed with myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MDS/MPN), while 61 revealed a "reactive" bone marrow ("RBM" group). Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in Hb, RDW-CV%, NRBC%, and RET% values between the "MDS" and the "RBM" group. Specific cutoff values were then indicated and employed for the formulation of a SS of high sensitivity (86.84%) and specificity (86.89%). The encouraging performance characteristics of the proposed SS were also confirmed in the BM comparison set. Automated BM counts on hematology analyzers contributed to the formulation of a SS for the screening discrimination between reactive and MDS BM fluids, which seems to be applicable and informative, regardless of the analyzer used.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.