Abstract

The aim of this study was to conduct a comparative analysis, utilizing CT scans, of ossification patterns in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients who underwent early secondary gingivoalveoloplasty (esGAP) versus those who underwent traditional alveolar bone grafting harvested from the iliac crest (IC). 22 CT scans of patients consecutively treated with esGAP were compared with those of 21 patients treated with bone grafting from iliac crest (IC). Inclusion criteria were non syndromic UCLP patients in permanent dentition. Two parameters were considered: the alveolar thickness, measured at three levels, and the nasoalveolar height. All measurements were normalized and ratios of the affected versus non affected sides were provided as well as the statistical comparison between the two groups' ossification outcomes. In the esGAP sample nasoalveolar height was categorized as ideal and good in 86.36% and in 13.64% of the cases and no mediocre or insufficient ossification was detected, while in the bone grafting sample 38.10% had ideal and good ossification, 14.29% mediocre and 9.52% insufficient. As regard the alveolar thickness, when we consider the average of three levels, for the esGAP sample was ideal and good in 57.57% and in 30.30% of the cases and for the IC sample in 41.27% and in 25.40% of the cases, respectively. The analysis detected a statistically significant difference in the ossification outcomes in the two samples. EsGAP yields superior ossification grades in comparison to IC bone grafting.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.