Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the bonding of AH Plus and Endofill sealers to intraradicular canal walls after different dentin surface treatments. Material and methods: Sixty canines were sectioned obtaining dentin discs with 4-mm thickness and were embedded in acrylic resin. The canals were prepared with diamond burs. The specimens were divided into two groups(n = 30): GI – AH Plus and GII – Endofill and were subdivided into three groups based on the dentin surface treatment (n = 10): A – distilled and deionized water (control), B – 17% EDTA, C – CO2 laser with 3W in continuous mode for 10s. The specimens were submitted to push out test in a universal testing machine. Results: Tukey test revealed that the IB (AH Plus/17% EDTA) (17.59 ± 6.04) and IC (AH Plus/CO2laser) (21.69 ± 4.93) subgroups had the highest values, which were statistically similar between each other (p > 0.05) and different from the other subgroups (p < 0.05). IIC subgroup (Endofill/CO2 laser)(7.25 ± 1.59) had intermediate values, which were statistically similar to (p > 0.05) IA subgroup (AH Plus/water) (10.99 ± 2.63), IIA subgroup (Endofill/water) (3.16 ± 0.83) and IIB subgroup (Endofill/ 17% EDTA) (5.31 ± 3.61), which had the smallest values (p < 0.05). Conclusion:The treatment of superficial intracanal dentin with CO2 laser and EDTA favored the adhesion of AH Plus and Endofill sealers.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.