Bond strength of CAD-CAM and conventional veneering materials to different frameworks

Abstract

Statement of problemNew materials and precise manufacturing processes allow for new processes in the veneering and production of fixed dental prostheses. However, data on the bond strength of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) and conventional veneering materials to substrates bonded with different composite resins are lacking. PurposeThe purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the shear bond strength (SBS) of 2 CAD-CAM, Lava Ultimate (LVU) and VITABLOCS Mark II (VMII), and 3 conventional veneering materials (VM9, VM13, VTI) to 3 different substrates: zirconia (ZIR), cobalt-chromium (CC), and titanium (TIT). Material and methodsSubstrates and veneering cylinders were manufactured and bonded by using 3 different composite resins, RelyX Unicem (RUL), RelyX Ultimate (RXU), and Sinfony (SIN), after various pretreatments (n=18). Half the specimens underwent artificial aging before SBS testing, and failure types were analyzed. Univariate 1-way ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U were computed (α=.05). ResultsCC substrates bonded with RUL showed the highest SBS (P=.007). ZIR substrates bonded with RXU presented higher SBS than TIT substrates (P=.007). ZIR substrates bonded with SIN showed higher SBS than CC substrates (P<.001). SIN veneered groups showed lower SBS than that observed for VM9/13/VTI (P<.001). SIN veneered LVU and VMII substrates presented lower SBS (P<.001). Thermocycling led to a reduction in SBS for most groups (P=.001-.022). SIN veneered substrates and RXU veneered VMII substrates resulted in lower SBS than that seen for VM9/13/VTI and veneered ZIR substrates bonded with SIN or RXU (P<.001). Adhesive failures were most common. ConclusionsWhile RUL is capable of forming a stable bond to CC without pretreatment, ZIR substrates achieve higher SBS after conditioning with an MDP-containing primer when using RXU or SIN than that seen for RUL. Pretreated CAD-CAM–veneered ZIR substrates bonded with SIN or RXU led to similar SBS results to those observed for conventional veneers, while veneering with SIN resulted in lower SBS.