Abstract

This study evaluated the immediate and 6-month dentin bond strength of universal adhesives used in etch-and-rinse or self-etch bonding strategies. The adhesives tested were Ambar Universal, G-Bond, Single Bond Universal, Tetric N-Bond Universal, and Ybond Universal. Gold standard adhesives (Scotchbond Multipurpose Plus and Clearfil SE Bond) were controls. Microtensile dentin bond strength (n=5 teeth), pH, and C=C conversion (n=3) were evaluated. Data were analyzed at α=0.05. All adhesives showed differences in pH. Ybond had intermediately strong aggressiveness, whereas the others were ultra-mild. The C=C conversion was different in most adhesives. In the etch-and-rinse strategy, all adhesives showed similar results generally except for G-Bond, which had lower bond strength than most adhesives. G-Bond and Tetric-N-Bond showed lower bond strengths after 6 months compared with 24 h, whereas the other adhesives had stable dentin bonds. In the self-etch strategy, G-Bond had lower bond strength than most adhesives. After 6 months, Ambar was the only adhesive showing lower dentin bond strength compared with 24 h. Most adhesives had discreet drops in bond strength during aging when used in the self-etch strategy. The failure modes were also material dependent, with a general pattern of increased adhesive and/or pre-testing failures after storage. In conclusion, the bonding performance of universal adhesives to dentin is material dependent. Most adhesives had stable dentin bonds with results comparable to the gold standard materials, particularly when applied in the self-etch mode. In general, it seems the use of universal adhesives in dentin should not be preceded by phosphoric acid etching.

Highlights

  • The clinical success of resin composite restorations depends on the effectiveness and durability of the adhesive interface [1]

  • According to the aggressiveness of self-etch adhesives, Ybond Universal and the primer of Clearfil SE Bond can be classified as intermediately strong, whereas all the other universal adhesives tested can be classified as having ultra-mild aggressiveness

  • The universal adhesive systems tested in this study had different performances in bonding to dentin when compared to each other

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The clinical success of resin composite restorations depends on the effectiveness and durability of the adhesive interface [1]. Current dental adhesive systems can be classified according to the strategy that they bond to dental tissues in etch-and-rinse adhesives, which require prior etching of surfaces with 37% phosphoric acid, or self-etch adhesives, which do not require prior acid etching and bond to dental tissues by means of acidic primers. When adequately performed, these two bonding strategies may demonstrate good results in long-term bonding [4]. Etch-and-rinse adhesives are still prevalent in many international dental markets

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call