Abstract

For the economical construction of fatigue loaded structures with textile reinforced concrete (TRC), it is necessary to investigate the fatigue behavior of the materials. Since next to the tensile load-bearing behavior, the bond behavior of a material is crucial as well, the present paper deals with the bond fatigue of TRC with epoxy-impregnated carbon textiles. First, static tests are carried out to determine the sufficient anchorage length of the investigated material combination. Afterwards, the influence of cyclic loading on the necessary anchorage length, deformation, stiffness, and residual strength is investigated. The results of the cyclic tests are summarized in stress-number of cycles to failure (S-N) diagrams. In the end, it can be said that the cyclic loading has no negative impact on the necessary anchorage length. If specimens withstand the cyclic loading, there is no difference between their residual strength and the reference strength. The failure of specimens occurs only at high load levels, provided that the anchorage length is sufficient.

Highlights

  • Textile reinforced concrete (TRC) has been under investigation for about two decades

  • Whilst the pedestrian bridges were built without prior separate fatigue investigations, the fatigue resistance of the road bridges was tested in the laboratory on true scaled structures

  • It is necessary to have a closer look at the fatigue behavior of textile reinforced concrete

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Textile reinforced concrete (TRC) has been under investigation for about two decades now. Textile reinforced concrete (TRC) has been under investigation for about two decades During this time, it was used—among other applications—for the construction of several bridges, e.g., [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. It is necessary to have a closer look at the fatigue behavior of textile reinforced concrete. This is among other things the objective of the research projects C3 -V1.2 and C3 -V2.1, belonging to the research program C3 –Carbon.

Methods
Test Setup
Manufacturing
Load Regime and Experimental Program
Reference Tests
Cyclic Stress–Strain Behavior
Development of Deformation
Dependence on Load Level
Comparison
Dependence on Anchorage Length
Comparison of normalized
General
General Remarks
S-N Diagram
Residual
15. Comparison minimum
16. Comparison
Results
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call