Abstract
Traps that captured boll weevils, Anthonomus grandis grandis Boheman, alive were more effective than traps requiring an adhesive. A thixotropic adhesive was convenient to work with but did not weather satisfactorily. A trap that turns with a slight breeze did not capture more weevils than stationary traps. A latin square in time experimental design was effective in removing variation of mean weevil capture due to effects of season and trap location when trap designs were compared around a cotton field. A commercial trap based on the design of the Leggett trap was effective in capturing weevils. Pigmented adhesive sprayed on a cotton plant was ineffective in capturing boll weevils that responded to grandlure.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
