Abstract

Peatlands represent a globally important carbon stock. Peat soil carbon stock assessments rely on measurements of carbon concentration, bulk density and soil depth. However, peat surface levels - and thus soil depths - change (“bog breathing”) largely as a response to peat shrinkage and expansion in relation to water table changes. This study assessed the magnitude of and potential for this mechanism to influence carbon stock calculations under field and laboratory conditions. In the UK, most peatlands are upland blanket bogs, of which a large proportion are managed as ‘grouse moors’. This currently involves rotational burning, although alternative management is increasingly considered. Peat depth and water tables were investigated on three grouse moors on blanket bog in northern England, comparing changes under different heather management interventions (burning, mowing and uncut). One site also allowed investigation of changes in relation to slope and under the three major bog vegetation types (ling heather, cottongrass and Sphagnum moss), which were compared to observed changes in peat cores under controlled laboratory conditions simulating periods of drought and rewetting. Changes in depth and bulk density were recorded and the potential implications for carbon stock estimates were calculated. Results highlight site specific relationships as potential habitat condition indicators and demonstrate that previously reported surface peat carbon losses resulting from enhanced decomposition under rising temperatures might also be explained by apparent changes due to peat shrinkage and expansion. It is recommended to accurately record bulk density and total peat depth measurements as part of peat carbon stock assessments.

Highlights

  • Peatlands contain * 30% of all soil organic carbon (SOC), despite covering only 3% of the land surface (Parish et al 2008)

  • (2) these peat surface and bulk density (BD) fluctuations can be affected by land management, vegetation type and water table depth (WTD)

  • The laboratory and field comparisons reported here supported the two initial hypotheses: firstly, that ‘apparent’ changes in Corg densities can be explained by peat surface fluctuations, highlighting the need to consider BD changes when reporting C stocks; secondly, that peat surface and BD fluctuations can be affected by land management, vegetation type and WTD

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Peatlands contain * 30% of all soil organic carbon (SOC), despite covering only 3% of the land surface (Parish et al 2008). Blanket bogs are a globally rare peatland habitat with the UK accounting for about 15% of the global total (Tallis 1998). In the UK, about 95% by area of all peatlands are blanket or raised bogs (Bain et al 2011), of which around 30% are subjected to rotational burning (Natural England 2010), commonly supported by draining of peat, to encourage increased abundance of ling heather (Calluna vulgaris) for grouse shooting. Burning on blanket bogs has been highlighted as having negative impacts on many of the peatland ecosystem services such as biodiversity, water storage, high quality drinking water provision, flood prevention and carbon (C) storage (Evans et al 2014). Exploring alternative heather management options such as mowing (see Heinemeyer et al 2019) is of key importance in relation to assessing the impacts of management and climate on long-term peat C accumulation and storage in blanket bogs

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call