Abstract

Japanese firms have become increasingly important first-tier suppliers to the U.S. commercial aircraft industry (large passenger jets). Over time, this relationship has evolved from a simple “build to print” subcontractor arrangement to a turnkey “design and build” risk-sharing partnership. Using the Boeing 767, 777, and 787 as examples, we argue that the motives for Boeing’s commercial outsourcing to Japan are to access the Japanese market, spread risk, gain access to capital, and lower U.S. spending on research and development (R&D). This has clear implications for U.S. trade and employment, in that Japanese-subcontracting boosts foreign imports and reduces the need for domestic production workers and U.S. suppliers. From a trade perspective, however, a troubling feature of allowing the Japanese to produce large commercial aircraft subassemblies is that major Japanese public financial supports are involved which contravene existing international agreements on production subsidies. We review the types of production contracts that Japanese companies have sought on the Boeing 767, 777, and 787 programs. These contracts have allowed the Japanese to develop new capabilities in terms of production capacity, tooling, design, and final assembly. Ultimately, these capabilities imply that Japan will eventually enter the market as a fully-fledged producer of commercial aircraft. This does not bode well for the U.S. commercial aerospace sector.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.