Bodyweight support alters the relationship between preferred walking speed and cost of transport

Abstract

Humans tend to select a preferred walking speed (PWS) that minimizes the metabolic energy consumed per distance traveled, i.e. the Cost of Transport (CoT). The aims of this study were to: 1. compare PWS overground vs. on a treadmill at 100 and 50% of body weight, and 2. explore whether with body weight support, PWS corresponds to the speed that minimizes CoT. Fifteen healthy adults walked overground and on a lower body positive pressure treadmill with and without bodyweight support. Walking speeds (m.s−1) were recorded for each condition. Rate of energy expenditure (J.kg−1.min−1) and CoT (J.kg−1.m−1) were then determined from 5-min walking trials with 50% bodyweight support at PWS and ± 30% of the self-selected walking speed for that condition. PWS did not differ across conditions. With 50% body weight support, for each 30% increase in walking speed, rates of metabolic energy expenditure increased ∼15% while CoT decreased by ∼14%. Thus, with 50% body weight support, PWS did not correspond with the speed that minimized CoT. Bodyweight support decreases cost of maintaining an upright body but does not decrease the metabolic demand of limb advancement, contributing to the linear yet not proportional changes in rates of energy expenditure and CoT. We conclude that bodyweight support via an AlterG® treadmill disconnects the association between PWS and minimum CoT. These findings have implications for clinical populations (e.g., obese, elderly) who may benefit from walking on a bodyweight supporting treadmill but may select speeds incompatible with their physical activity goals.