Abstract

Eyes evolved to detect the directions from which ambient luminance contrasts emanate. With varying degrees of acuity, both compound and simple chambered eyes register the angular position of visual features relative to either the fovea (azimuth and elevation) or to other visual features in the scene. Optic flow (dynamical changes in this angular information) is sufficient to specify unit-less aspects of the spatial visual world such as 3-dimensional form (à la the kinetic depth effect) or depth order (via dynamic occlusion). However, other aspects of the visual world, such as perceived size and extent, require a combining of visual angles with appropriate metrics, and in many cases, the body provides these requisite perceptual rulers. For example, via a simple trigonometric formula, the angular elevation of visual features viewed on the ground plane specifies their distance from the observer in units of eye height. The body provides a plethora of perceptual rules, each specific to the ongoing activity of the perceiver. For example, the sizes of graspable objects are perceived relative to the size of one’s hand, whereas the distance across an open field is scaled by how much walking will be required to traverse it. The literature on perceptual body scaling is divided into three general classes. Morphological scaling uses the metrics of the body’s skeletal structure – eye height, arm’s length, hand size – and its extension through the wielding of tools. Physiological scaling draws on the body’s internal, often metabolic, states as they relate to intended actions. For example, the amount of walking required to traverse an extent is scaled by the bioenergetic costs of locomotion. Finally, behavioral scaling is provided by the efficacy of intended actions. Research on embodied perception addresses the following question: By what units are metric spatial perceptions scaled? As summarized in this chapter, the solution to this problem is a specification of what aspects of the body are used to scale spatial percepts given the observer’s phenotype and the intended actions afforded by their physical surroundings. Roughly 100 research articles are reviewed.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.