Abstract

BackgroundPredation is one of the most important natural selection forces. Prey species can optimize feeding behavior and escape from predators based on mobility conditioned by body proportions. With age, mobility capacity increases and individuals are more efficient in finding resources and safety (e.g., food and refuge). Birds’ mobility is driven by the dimensions, of the head and torso, as well as the extremities and flight feathers. To assess the relationship between body traits and to understand how body proportions are organized in wild Red-legged partridges (Alectoris rufa), we used biometric data from nearly 14,000 individuals, obtained during a long-term study (1988–2011) on a wild population.ResultsWe used GLMs and regressions to model the relationship between body mass and the size of body parts. We found that wing length was the morphological part best explained by other body trait measures. Wing length models were better predictors in juveniles than in adults and in females than in males. Wing length and feather length, mass and total length are the most strongly related parts; mass and wing length, total length and feather length are moderately related. The association between mass and wing length is intermediated by feather length and total length.ConclusionsSocial inclusion, feeding and predator evasion may be affected by body structure intermediated by mobility and health. Our results suggest that proportions of the body, extremities and flight feathers drive mobility which is intimately associated with ecology, biological efficiency, health and physical optimization. Our findings showed that wing size was strongly allied to other body part measurements, enhancing the importance of body structure conformation for flight. Our study highlights the scaled relationship of body structure among age-sex classes and its relevance to social cohesion, flock movement and the balance between predation and starvation.

Highlights

  • Predation is one of the most important natural selection forces

  • We argue that body structure can affect survival, based on a causal chain: morphology is related to mobility, mobility is related to escape, escape is related to predation [29]

  • In previous studies we found scaling between mass and body length, wing length [38], 8th, 9th 10th feather length, and surface index [39], with bivariate approximations of multivariate phenomena

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Prey species can optimize feeding behavior and escape from predators based on mobility conditioned by body proportions. Body structure is related to motion and function, as well as to diseases and dysfunctions [1, 2]. In humans and dogs, obesity may indicate disease and the loss of mobility [6,7,8]. Body structure is defined as the regular proportions of different parts of an animal. These proportions are frequently studied through the. The relationship between form and function in animals is supported by proportions of different morphological parts, which change according to species, sex, and age classes [13]. Locomotor performance can be influenced by age, sex, breed and species

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call