Abstract

Understanding how we consciously experience our bodies is a fundamental issue in cognitive neuroscience. Two fundamental components of this are the sense of body ownership (the experience of the body as one's own) and the sense of agency (the feeling of control over one's bodily actions). These constructs have been used to investigate the incorporation of prostheses. To date, however, no evidence has been provided showing whether representations of ownership and agency in amputees are altered when operating a robotic prosthesis. Here we investigated a robotic arm using myoelectric control, for which the user varied the joint position continuously, in a rubber hand illusion task. Fifteen able-bodied participants and three trans-radial amputees were instructed to contract their wrist flexors/extensors alternately, and to watch the robotic arm move. The sense of ownership in both groups was extended to the robotic arm when the wrists of the real and robotic arm were flexed/extended synchronously, with the effect being smaller when they moved in opposite directions. Both groups also experienced a sense of agency over the robotic arm. These results suggest that these experimental settings induced successful incorporation of the prosthesis, at least for the amputees who took part in the present study.

Highlights

  • A fundamental issue in cognitive neuroscience involves trying to understand how it is that we consciously experience our bodies

  • We tested the degree to which the participants felt that their right arm was located closer to the robotic arm after the illusion; this is known as proprioceptive drift, a response measure that is commonly used in rubber hand illusion (RHI) research

  • There was no significant difference between the ownership score with versus without the paintbrush in the in-phase movement conditions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A fundamental issue in cognitive neuroscience involves trying to understand how it is that we consciously experience our bodies. The results of this study once again revealed that the participants experienced the SO and SA over the rubber hand in the synchronous condition [13]. Upper limb amputees can experience a rubber hand as part of their own body upon the application of synchronous touches to their stump and the artificial hand [19,20]. Rosen et al demonstrated that amputees experienced a SO over an artificial hand by applying synchronous touches to the participant’s stump and the artificial hand. They demonstrated that the amputees experienced a SO over the artificial hand when it was controlled by the activity of their own arm muscle [22]. Our experiments revealed significant increases in subjective ratings of the SO and SA, in the able-bodied participants and in the amputees

Experimental settings for the robotic arm
Procedure
Psychological evaluation
Data analyses
Participants
Experimental setting for the robotic arm in amputees
Able-bodied participants
Amputees
Discussion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call