Body magnetic resonance angiography and its effect on the use of alternative imaging--experience in 1026 patients.

Abstract

Time-of-flight magnetic resonance (MR) angiography has been described for numerous applications but the number of patients described in published reports is usually relatively small. There is little information concerning the general utility of MR angiography in the body, outside the cranial circulation, or its effect on use of other imaging studies. Utilization of two-dimensional (2D) time-of-flight MR angiography over a 3 year period was reviewed to determine its accuracy and impact on other imaging modalities. Cranial and cardiac studies were excluded. Correlation was made with alternative imaging and surgical findings. Between January 1990 and December 1992 2D time-of-flight MR angiography was used to examine 1026 patients. MR angiography was used most frequently to examine the venous system. There was a slight reduction in the use of alternative imaging with two exceptions. When chest MR venography was performed, alternative imaging was completely abolished. Also, contrast portal venography was virtually eliminated. Five errors (0.2% of total MR angiography examinations) were recorded. Time-of-flight MR angiography, especially MR venography, is accurate and can replace contrast venography for abdominal and thoracic applications. Cost and limited availability means that other imaging, usually ultrasound, often precedes MR angiography.