Abstract

Distortions of body image have often been investigated in clinical disorders. Much of this literature implicitly assumes healthy adults maintain an accurate body image. We recently developed a novel, implicit, and quantitative measure of body image — the Body Image Task (BIT). Here, we report a large-scale analysis of performance on this task by healthy adults. In both an in-person and an online version of the BIT, participants were presented with an image of a head as an anchoring stimulus on a computer screen, and told to imagine that the head was part of a mirror image of themselves in a standing position. They were then instructed to judge where, relative to the head, each of several parts of their body would be located. The relative positions of each landmark can be used to construct an implicit perceptual map of bodily structure. We could thus measure the internally-stored body image, although we cannot exclude contributions from other representations. Our results show several distortions of body image. First, we found a large and systematic over-estimation of width relative to height. These distortions were similar for both males and females, and did not closely track the idiosyncrasies of individual participant's own bodies. Comparisons of individual body parts showed that participants overestimated the width of their shoulders and the length of their upper arms, relative to their height, while underestimating the lengths of their lower arms and legs. Principal components analysis showed a clear spatial structure to the distortions, suggesting spatial organisation and segmentation of the body image into upper and lower limb components that are bilaterally integrated. These results provide new insight into the body image of healthy adults, and have implications for the study and rehabilitation of clinical populations.

Highlights

  • The brain contains a number of body representations for interpreting sensory information and interacting with the environment. Head and Holmes (1911) provided the classic description of different ‘schemata’ representing the body: a ‘postural schema’ maintaining a continuouslyupdated representation of current body posture, and a ‘superficial schema’ mediating localisation of touch onto the body surface

  • We recently developed a similar approach to test the implicit perceived size of body parts and overall body configuration — the Body Image Task (BIT) (Fuentes, Pazzaglia, Longo, Scivoletto, & Haggard, 2013)

  • Two-tailed t-tests revealed that the length of 13 of 14 body parts was distorted from true size

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The brain contains a number of body representations for interpreting sensory information and interacting with the environment. Head and Holmes (1911) provided the classic description of different ‘schemata’ representing the body: a ‘postural schema’ maintaining a continuouslyupdated representation of current body posture, and a ‘superficial schema’ mediating localisation of touch onto the body surface. The brain contains a number of body representations for interpreting sensory information and interacting with the environment. There is evidence of lexical-semantic (Schwoebel & Coslett, 2005) and topological (Pick, 1922) representations of the body, which can be selectively impaired in some cases of focal brain damage (Schwoebel & Coslett, 2005). A further representation of the body, though, is the so-called “body image”, a conscious representation that is commonly thought to rely predominantly on visual information, and represents the sizes and shapes of body parts and their arrangement to form a whole (Gallagher & Cole, 1995). Note that the use of the term “body image” need not include emotional and aesthetic elements,

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call