Body fluid contamination in the context of an adverse analytical finding in doping: About a case involving ostarine

Abstract

Ostarine, also known as MK-2866 or enobosarm, is a selective androgen receptor modulator (SARM). It has anabolic properties and as such is widely used in doping, accounting in 2021 for 25 % of the adverse analytical findings (AAF) among the class S1.2 “Other anabolic agents” of products banned by the World Anti-Doping Agency, to which it belongs. But in some cases, it can be responsible for an AAF following contamination. We report the case of an athlete who contaminated herself by exchanging body fluids while kissing her boyfriend, who took 25 mg per day of MK-2866 for 9 days prior to the athlete's AAF (urinary concentration evaluated at 13 ng/mL) without her knowledge. Both subjects came to our lab for hair testing. The athlete's hair was black and slightly frizzy. Six segments of 2 cm then 7 × 3 cm (33 cm) were analysed and showed increasing concentrations, from 2 pg/mg on the first segment to 17.8 pg/mg on the last segment. The boyfriend's hair, light-brown, analyzed on 4 × 2 cm, also showed increasing values, from 65 to 143 pg/mg. These gradients of concentration in the hair’s athlete and in her boyfriend were compatible with external contamination of the hair, confirmed by analysis of washing baths, pillowcases (150 pg on each), and the athlete's hairbrush (250 pg).Fingernails were also contaminated, with 21 pg/mg in the athlete and 1041 pg/mg in the boyfriend, with highly contaminated washing baths, and toenails were less contaminated, with 2 pg/mg in the athlete and 17.3 pg/mg in the boyfriend. Urine samples taken 35 days after the start of MK-2866 treatment showed a value of 3690 ng/mL in the boyfriend and 5.7 ng/mL in the athlete. After 6 days off, these concentrations were 3.3 ng/mL and 0.1 ng/mL, respectively. A controlled transfer study was carried out 12 days after discontinuation (urine concentrations returned to negative level). After administration of 17 mg (the 25 mg/mL vial having been controlled at 17 mg/mL), urine samples were taken from the boyfriend and the athlete (n = 10 for each) for more than 25 h after they had been living normally with each other (regular kissing in particular). The boyfriend's urine concentrations ranged from 681 ng/mL to 12822 ng/mL (Tmax = 8:30 hrs), and the athlete's from 0.3 ng/mL to 13 ng/mL with Tmax = 8:30 hrs, i.e. at 22:30 hrs, which corresponded exactly to the time of collection of the urine that showed AAF, with a similar concentration. The dose ingested by the athlete was estimated at 15 µg. These results demonstrate the transfer of ostarine via body fluids between two subjects, with a high risk of AAF in one athlete, as observed in our case.