Abstract

The present study examines the energy efficiency of self-propelled hydrofoils for various modes and kinematics of swimming adopted by various body-caudal fin fish. In particular, this work considers the intermittent burst-and-coast (B&C) and continuous swimming modes, and examines the effect of the undulating and/or pitching swimming kinematics, adopted by the undulating body of anguilliform fish and pitching caudal fin of carangiform and thunniform fish. Notably, B&C swimming is adopted in nature mostly by the latter class but rarely by the former. This fact forms the basis of our study on the hydrodynamics and propulsion performance for both classes of fish-inspired swimming using a NACA0012 hydrofoil model. This analysis explores a large parameter space covering undulation wavelength, 0.8≤λ*<∞, Reynolds number, 50≤Ref≤1500, and duty cycle (DC), 0.1≤DC≤1, with the DC representing the fraction of time in B&C swimming. The fluid–structure dynamics-based vortex-shedding-process is investigated, where B&C swimming results in either an asymmetric reverse von Karman (RVK) or forward von Karman vortex street, rather than a symmetric RVK vortex street observed during continuous swimming. It is demonstrated that the B&C swimming results in an energy saving, although there is a concomitant increase in the travel time. Moreover, our results show that B&C swimming is effective for carangiform and thunniform tail-like kinematics but not for anguilliform body-like kinematics of the hydrofoil. Thus, the predictions are consistent with the observed swimming behavior adopted by a fish in nature and provide input into the efficient design of unmanned underwater vehicles.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call