Abstract

Drawing from deep longitudinal and ethnographic work, this article interrogates a set of key relationships between bodies, gender and infrastructure in the context of understanding cities such as Bharatpur and Dhangadhi in Nepal as well as Delhi, India. This article seeks to make two contributions. First, utilizing feminist political geography approaches, we examine bodies as infrastructure, referring to how the social and material work of the body helps to build, develop and maintain cities through gendered infrastructures in the everyday. We show conceptualizing bodies as infrastructure reveals important and intimate dimensions of the everyday politics and social and material forms that enable critical resources to flow and integral networks be built in cities. Second, we demonstrate from our comparative case studies the ways that gendered “slow infrastructural violence” accrues through patterns of infrastructural invisibility. Particular bodies act as urban infrastructure in everyday and unremarkable ways, shaping the uneven social and political consequences of embodied infrastructural configurations. We specifically examine slow violence and informal financial infrastructure in Bharatpur and the provisioning of health in Dhangadhi followed by the exploration of slow violence and fragmented water in Delhi. This article thus raises a simultaneous call for theoretical engagement with the socio-materiality of infrastructure and the body, an increased regard for the multiplicity of urban infrastructures, and an interrogation of gender and infrastructural politics in cities where more people will be living in the future and where politics and infrastructure are being actively created.

Highlights

  • Critical urban scholars and geographers focusing on southern ur­ banism have created an impressive and growing literature on infra­ structure

  • One of the primary goals of the paper is to open up analytical space to consider the everyday politics and practices that shape, and becomeproduced, as bodies engage in infrastructural labor, care, knowledge networks and social work

  • In our comparative case studies of Bharatpur, Dhangadhi and Delhi, we show how gendered bodies as infrastructure are connected to wider social, political, and economic processes at the neighborhood, city and regional scale, demonstrating how the politics of the city is intimately connected to the gendered politics of the body, and vice versa

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Critical urban scholars and geographers focusing on southern ur­ banism have created an impressive and growing literature on infra­ structure. While acknowledging the tremendous and var­ ied scholarship in urban studies on the multiplicity of infrastructure, there continues to be a need to further interrogate how living social and material infrastructures shape, maintain, and enable urban life, politics, and distinctly unequal lived experiences of the city As scholars such as Simone (2004) demonstrate that “people are infrastructure” through flows of information and networks of collaboration in cities like Johannesburg, and Elyachar (2010) demonstrates the social infrastruc­ ture she calls “phatic labor” that women use to bolster financial net­ works and resilience in cities like Cairo, we build on this body of work in several distinct ways. This article raises a simultaneous call for theoretical engagement with the socio-materiality of infrastructure and the body, an increased regard for the multiplicity of urban infrastructures, and an interrogation of gender and infrastructural politics in the city

Experiencing cities
Bodies as infrastructure
Slow infrastructural violence
The body as infrastructure in Nepal’s cities
The body as infrastructure in Delhi
Between empowerment and slow violence: informal financial infrastructure
Slow violence and fragmented water in unplanned Delhi
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call