Abstract

Type II germ cell cancers (GCC) can be subdivided into seminomas and non-seminomas. Seminomas are similar to carcinoma in situ (CIS) cells, the common precursor of type II GCCs, with regard to epigenetics and expression, while embryonal carcinomas (EC) are totipotent and differentiate into teratomas, yolk-sac tumors and choriocarcinomas. GCCs can present as seminomas with a non-seminoma component, raising the question if a CIS gives rise to seminomas and ECs at the same time or whether seminomas can be reprogrammed to ECs. In this study, we utilized the seminoma cell line TCam-2 that acquires an EC-like status after xenografting into the murine flank as a model for a seminoma to EC transition and screened for factors initiating and driving this process. Analysis of expression and DNA methylation dynamics during transition of TCam-2 revealed that many pluripotency- and reprogramming-associated genes were upregulated while seminoma-markers were downregulated. Changes in expression level of 53 genes inversely correlated to changes in DNA methylation. Interestingly, after xenotransplantation 6 genes (GDF3, NODAL, DNMT3B, DPPA3, GAL, AK3L1) were rapidly induced, followed by demethylation of their genomic loci, suggesting that these 6 genes are poised for expression driving the reprogramming. We demonstrate that inhibition of BMP signaling is the initial event in reprogramming, resulting in activation of the pluripotency-associated genes and NODAL signaling. We propose that reprogramming of seminomas to ECs is a multi-step process. Initially, the microenvironment causes inhibition of BMP signaling, leading to induction of NODAL signaling. During a maturation phase, a fast acting NODAL loop stimulates its own activity and temporarily inhibits BMP signaling. During the stabilization phase, a slow acting NODAL loop, involving WNTs re-establishes BMP signaling and the pluripotency circuitry. In parallel, DNMT3B-driven de novo methylation silences seminoma-associated genes and epigenetically fixes the EC state.

Highlights

  • IntroductionType II germ cell cancers (GCC) arise from a precursor lesion termed carcinoma in situ (CIS) [1]

  • Typical features of seminomas and embryonal carcinomasType II germ cell cancers (GCC) arise from a precursor lesion termed carcinoma in situ (CIS) [1]

  • We demonstrate that germ cell cancer development is a microenvironment-dependent plastic process that allows latent pluripotent seminomas /TCam-2 to acquire primed pluripotency and transit into an Embryonal carcinomas (EC)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Type II germ cell cancers (GCC) arise from a precursor lesion termed carcinoma in situ (CIS) [1]. Seminomas grow as a uniform tumor mass and are similar to CIS and PGCs with respect to gene expression. They express PGC- and pluripotency markers like PRDM1 (BLIMP1), TFAP2C, cKIT, SOX17, NANOG and OCT3/4 [1] [3] [4] [5]. Like CIS and PGCs, seminomas display DNA hypomethlyation compared to other GCC entities [6] [7]. The DNA of ECs is highly methylated compared to CIS and seminomas [6]. A reprogramming of a seminoma to an EC increases the risk of a poor outcome and would make it necessary to adjust the treatment strategy during a patient’s therapy

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call