Abstract
When major injuries occur to the thoracic outlet, common practice is to obtain an arteriogram without other clinical evidence of vascular injury, because of the purported high association of thoracic outlet trauma and vascular injuries, including ruptured aortae. In order to evaluate this association, a review was undertaken of all patients admitted to a major hospital over 5.5 years who underwent angiography or other evaluative measures as a result of their thoracic outlet trauma. There were no great vessel or aortic injuries without overt clinical criteria. Angiography for aortic and great vessel injury is unnecessary unless there is a widened mediastinum or other overt clinical indications of vascular injury. Judicious use or avoidance of angiography is therefore encouraged for multiple reasons.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
