Blunt Abdominal Trauma Severity Scoring System: Exceptional Score in Blunt Abdominal Trauma Management

Abstract

Objectives The abdomen is a diagnostic black box. Physical examination of the abdomen is unreliable in making this determination, and sometimes clinical evaluation is difficult due to the influence of drugs or alcohol by patients or abdominal injuries occurring with head or spinal cord injuries. However, the presence of abdominal rigidity or hemodynamic compromise is an indication for prompt surgical exploration. For the remainder of patients, a variety of diagnostic adjuncts are used to identify abdominal injury. In this study, our aim is to find the answer of these questions, (1) What was the major indication for operation in each case? (2) Did delays in getting the patient to the operating room affect the outcome? (3) How to find morbidity and mortality in blunt abdominal injuries, at the behest of the Blunt Abdominal Trauma Severity Scoring System (BATSS). Material and Methods A retrospective study of 100 cases of blunt abdominal trauma was done Sheth Lallubhai Gordhandas Municipal General Hospital, Narendra Modi Medical College, Ahmedabad, for the accuracy of the BATSS score. Patients were divided into three groups according to the BATSS: (1) ≥12 score group, (2) 8–11 score group, and (3) <8 score group. Results Operative management was more common in the high-risk group, while the low-risk group was managed conservatively under expert guidance. The mean BATSS scores in operative and conservative management were 14.77 ± 2.91 and 5.12 ± 2.56, respectively. The BATSS score had an 87.1% Specificity, 100% Sensitivity, 94.5% Negative Predictive value (NPV), 100% Positive Predictive value (PPV) and an overall Accuracy of 96%. Conclusion BATSS is important for triage and is an excellent tool for recognising and picking up high-risk patients with blunt abdominal injuries.