Abstract

IntroductionPatients are commonly admitted to the hospital for observation following blunt abdominal trauma (BAT), despite initially negative emergency department (ED) evaluations. With the current use of screening technology, such as computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis, ultrasound, and laboratory evaluations, it is unclear which patients require observation. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of intra-abdominal injury (IAI) and death in hemodynamically normal and stable BAT patients with initially negative ED evaluations admitted to an ED observation unit and to define a low-risk subgroup of patients and assess whether they may be discharged without abdominal/pelvic CT or observation.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study performed at an urban level 1 trauma center and included all BAT patients admitted to an ED observation unit as part of a BAT key clinical pathway. All were observed for at least 8 hours as part of the key clinical pathway, and only minors and pregnant women were excluded. Outcomes included the presence of IAI or death during a 40-month follow-up period. Prior to data collection, low-risk criteria were defined as no intoxication, no hypotension or tachycardia, no abdominal pain or tenderness, no hematuria, and no distracting injury. To be considered low risk, patients needed to meet all low-risk criteria.ResultsOf the 1,169 patients included over the 2-year study period, 29% received a CT of the abdomen and pelvis, 6% were admitted to the hospital from the observation unit for further management, 0.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.1%–1%) were diagnosed with IAI, and 0% (95% CI, 0%–0.3%) died. Patients had a median combined ED and observation length of stay of 9.5 hours. Of the 237 (20%) patients who met low-risk criteria, 7% had a CT of the abdomen and pelvis and 0% (95% CI, 0%–1.5%) were diagnosed with IAI or died.ConclusionMost BAT patients who have initially negative ED evaluations are at low risk for IAI but still require some combination of observation and CT. A subgroup of BAT patients may be safely discharged without CT or observation after the initial evaluation.

Highlights

  • Patients are commonly admitted to the hospital for observation following blunt abdominal trauma (BAT), despite initially negative emergency department (ED) evaluations

  • Of the 1,169 patients included over the 2-year study period, 29% received a computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis, 6% were admitted to the hospital from the observation unit for further management, 0.4% (95% confidence interval [confidence intervals (CI)], 0.1%–1%) were diagnosed with intra-abdominal injury (IAI), and 0% died

  • Most BAT patients who have initially negative ED evaluations are at low risk for IAI but still require some combination of observation and CT

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Diagnostic evaluation of patients with BAT varies but may include such modalities as physical examination, focused ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), diagnostic peritoneal lavage, laparoscopy, laparotomy, laboratory tests, or observation. A significant body of data indicates that physical examination alone is an insensitive predictor of IAI in the setting of blunt trauma.[11,12,13,14,15] laboratory tests play a limited role in this setting.[1,16,17,18] CT, excellent for detecting and grading solid organ injuries, is less sensitive for detecting certain injuries, including those to the mesentery, bowel, pancreas, and diaphragm.[19,20] The prospect of missing injuries has constituted the rationale for observing patients following BAT

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call