Abstract
A structure–property relationship study of neutral heteroleptic (1 and 2, [Ir(C∧N)2(L∧X)]) and homoleptic (3 and 4, fac-[Ir(C∧N)3]) Ir(III) complexes (where L∧X = anionic 2,2,6,6-tetramethylheptane-3,5-dionato-κO3,κO6 (thd) and C∧N = a cyclometalating ligand bearing a pentafluorosulfanyl (−SF5) electron-withdrawing group (EWG) at the C4 (HL1) and C3 (HL2) positions of the phenyl moiety) is presented. These complexes have been fully structurally characterized, including by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, and their electrochemical and optical properties have also been extensively studied. While complexes 1 ([Ir(L1)2(thd)]), 3 (Ir(L1)3), and 4 (Ir(L2)3) exhibit irreversible first reduction waves based on the pentafluorosulfanyl substituent in the range of −1.71 to −1.88 V (vs SCE), complex 2 ([Ir(L2)2(thd)]) exhibits a quasi-reversible pyridineC∧N-based first reduction wave that is anodically shifted at −1.38 V. The metal + C∧N ligand oxidation waves are all quasi-reversible in the range of 1.08–1.54 V (vs SCE). The optical gap, determined from the lowest energy absorption maxima, decreases from 4 to 2 to 3 to 1, and this trend is consistent with the Hammett behavior (σm/σp with respect to the metal–carbon bond) of the −SF5 EWG. In degassed acetonitrile, for complexes 2–4, introduction of the −SF5 group produced a blue-shifted emission (λem 484–506 nm) in comparison to reference complexes [Ir(ppy)2(acac)] (R1, where acac = acetylacetonato) (λem 528 nm in MeCN), [Ir(CF3-ppy) (acac)] (R3, where CF3-ppyH = 2-(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)pyridine) (λem 522 nm in DCM), and [Ir(CF3-ppy)3] (R8) (λem 507 nm in MeCN). The emission of complex 1, in contrast, was modestly red shifted (λem 534 nm). Complexes 2 and 4, where the −SF5 EWG is substituted para to the Ir–CC∧N bond, are efficient phosphorescent emitters, with high photoluminescence quantum yields (ΦPL = 58–79% in degassed MeCN solution) and microsecond emission lifetimes (τε = 1.35–3.02 μs). Theoretical and experimental observations point toward excited states that are principally ligand centered (3LC) in nature, but with a minor metal-to-ligand charge-transfer (3MLCT) transition component, as a function of the regiochemistry of the pentafluorosulfanyl group. The 3LC character is predominant over the mixed 3CT character for complexes 1, 2, and 4, while in complex 3, there is exclusive 3LC character as demonstrated by unrestricted density functional theory (DFT) calculations. The short emission lifetimes and reasonable ΦPL values in doped thin film (5 wt % in PMMA), particularly for 4, suggest that these neutral complexes would be attractive candidate emitters in organic light-emitting diodes.
Highlights
Phosphorescent iridium complexes bearing arylpyridine cyclometalating (C∧N) and ancillary ligands (either anionic (L∧X) or neutral (L∧L)) have gained widespread interest among researchers because of their remarkable optoelectronic properties: e.g., good color tunability, high photoluminescence qpuhaontotu- manydietldhser(mΦoPsLt)a,bislhitoyr.1t−e3mTishsiisoncolinfefltuimenecse(τoef),paronpdehrtiigehs render these complexes as attractive candidates as emitters for solid-state electroluminescent devices, the most common of which are organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) or lightemitting electrochemical cells (LEECs),[4−7] bioimaging agents,[8,9] and sensing applications.[10]
We investigated the optoelectronic properties of cationic Ir(III) complexes bearing an −SF5 electron-withdrawing group (EWG) on ppy or phenylpyrazole C∧N ligands,[26] with the substituent position of the EWG varied so as to adopt either a para or meta relationship with respect to the Ir−CC∧N bond
Ligands HL1 and HL2 were reacted with IrCl3·3H2O, and the resulting iridium dimers [Ir(L1)2(μ-Cl)]2 (D1) and [Ir(L2)2(μ-Cl)]2 (D2) were obtained in good yield and used directly in the synthetic step.[41]
Summary
Phosphorescent iridium complexes bearing arylpyridine cyclometalating (C∧N) and ancillary ligands (either anionic (L∧X) or neutral (L∧L)) have gained widespread interest among researchers because of their remarkable optoelectronic properties: e.g., good color tunability, high photoluminescence qpuhaontotu- manydietldhser(mΦoPsLt)a,bislhitoyr.1t−e3mTishsiisoncolinfefltuimenecse(τoef),paronpdehrtiigehs render these complexes as attractive candidates as emitters for solid-state electroluminescent devices, the most common of which are organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) or lightemitting electrochemical cells (LEECs),[4−7] bioimaging agents,[8,9] and sensing applications.[10] With respect to their use in OLEDs, neutral Ir(III) complexes are generally more desirable in comparison to cationic Ir(III) complexes, as they can be vacuum deposited. High-efficiency white flat-panel displays require combined emission from red, green, and blue (RGB) emitters. While the color purity and efficiency of red Received: April 28, 2017 Published: June 14, 2017.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.