Abstract

Frontier mineral exploration is often exclusively focused on assessing geological potential without consideration for the economic viability of resource development. This strategy may overlook potentially prosperous zones for more geologically-favoured but financially-disadvantageous regions, or conversely, may introduce implicit biases against potential developments without due regard to underlying economies of scale or proximity to infrastructure. Accordingly, in this paper, we introduce a numerical model aimed at identifying economic fairways, i.e. areas permissive to mineral development from an economic perspective. The model, Bluecap, combines large-scale infrastructure and geological datasets to conduct geospatial analysis of the economic-viability of mining operations across Australia.We provide a detailed description of the inputs and assumptions that underlie the cost models employed in Bluecap, outlining the methods used to evaluate mining, processing, administrative and infrastructure expenses. We also describe the databases used by the model to evaluate available infrastructure, transportation distances and depth of cover. Finally, we present examples that demonstrate the use of the Bluecap model on regions around Mount Isa and the Murray Basin to verify its ability to evaluate commercially feasible mineral prospects. While the immediate utility of this model stands to benefit mineral explorers, its ability to map mineral economic fairways also provides an objective, evidence base to underpin government decision making with respect to position of new infrastructure and consideration of competing land use claims.

Highlights

  • In recent years, the majority of exploration expenditure in the Australian mining industry has been directed towards developments that expand the boundaries of existing reserve or resource estimates, or that identify nearfield satellite deposits (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2019; Senior, 2019)

  • Within Australia, significant research effort and funding aligned with the National Mineral Exploration Strategy (Geoscience Australia, 2017a,b) and the UNCOVER initiative (UNCOVER group, 2012) is being directed towards developing data sources and techniques to enable identification of mineral deposits under cover

  • The Bluecap simulator provides a simple model for mapping eco­ nomic viability of mining development in regions across Australia

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The majority of exploration expenditure in the Australian mining industry has been directed towards developments that expand the boundaries of existing reserve or resource estimates, or that identify nearfield satellite deposits (Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2019; Senior, 2019). This approach of understanding the regional economic fairways, where the thresholds for the characteristics (e.g. size, grade, etc.) of an economic deposit are lower, can be inserted mid-way into our exploration process to provide more informed assessments of regional prospectivity This approach is applicable in situ­ ations where substantial regional variations in cost drivers may exist, as is the case for Australia where distance to infrastructure and the depth of cover overlying potential mineral deposits varies substantially across the nation and within exploration tenements. With these goals in mind, this paper describes the operation of a geospatial economic simulator – Bluecap – developed for Australian mining conditions. The use of the simulator is demonstrated through example case studies from the re­ gions around Mount Isa and the Murray Basin

Bluecap model
Orebody types and mining methods
Mining system
General and Administrative Costs
Infrastructure
Economic model
Nyears i
Regional calculations
Case studies
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call