Abstract

This study offers a macro-historical geographic comparison of blue-green urban infrastructure in the coastal cities of Boston, USA and Mumbai (formerly Bombay), India. After introducing the aims and methods of comparative historical geography, we focus on the insights that these two cases offer. Their stories begin with ancient coastal fishing settlements, followed by early processes of urbanization and fortification in the 17th century. By the late-18th century Anglo-American merchants in Boston were trading with Parsi merchants in Bombay, at a time when Bostonians had little more to sell than ice in exchange for India’s fine textiles. From the early-19th century onwards, the two maritime cities undertook surprisingly parallel processes of land reclamation and water development. Boston commissioned blue-green infrastructure proposals at the urban scale, from Frederick Law Olmsted’s Back Bay Fens to Charles Eliot’s Metropolitan Park District Plan—innovations that offer more than a century of lessons in environmental performance and resilience. The two cities developed parallel “Esplanade,” “Back Bay,” and “Reclamation” projects. None of these projects anticipated the magnitude of 20th century land, water, and infrastructure change. Both cities have begun to address the increasing risks of urban flooding, sea level rise, and population displacement, but they need bolder metropolitan visions of blue-green urban infrastructure to address emerging climate change and water hazards.

Highlights

  • Urbanization increases the density of built infrastructure, which is accompanied by the loss, of blue and green spaces, but of social interaction and other changes to the cultural fabric that negatively impact the well-being of city dwellers

  • We do recognize that many obstacles surrounding Blue-Green infrastructure (BGI) projects need to be resolved in order to be more influential and successful. We have studied both the obstacles to and the opportunities for BGI and present this knowledge here to increase awareness and support implementation for projects around the world

  • While we identified many obstacles and barriers in each of the cases studied in this report, we emphasize that these cases provide examples for confronting these challenges and have found convincing and inspiring cases of success

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urbanization increases the density of built infrastructure, which is accompanied by the loss, of blue and green spaces, but of social interaction and other changes to the cultural fabric that negatively impact the well-being of city dwellers. These impacts are often disproportionately borne by the poor. It is widely acknowledged that urbanization exerts immense pressures on ecosystems, natural capital, and global nutrient cycles.1 These pressures have altered ecosystem functioning, resulting in immense changes to regional and global biodiversity as well as a significant loss of species, which is occurring at a rate not seen since the last mass extinction. India, China and Nigeria are expected to host 37% of the projected worldwide population growth by 2050.2

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call