Blue, Green and Red Fluorescence Signatures and Images of Tobacco Leaves*

Abstract

AbstractLaser‐induced fluorescence images of the leaf of an aurea mutant of Nicotiana tabacum were recorded for the blue and green fluorescence at 440 and 520 nm and the red chlorophyll fluorescence at 690 and 735 nm. The results obtained were compared with direct measurements of the fluorescence emission spectra of leaves using a conventional spectrofluorometer. The highest emission of blue (F440) and green fluorescence (F520) within the leaf was found in the leaf veins, particularly the main leaf vein. In contrast, the intercostal fields of leaves, which exhibited the highest chlorophyll content, showed only a very low blue and green fluorescence emission, which was much lower than the red and far‐red chlorophyll fluorescence emission bands (F690 and F735). Correspondingly, the ratio of blue to red leaf fluorescence F440/F690 of upper and lower leaf side was much higher in the leaf veins (values 1.2 to 1.5) than in intercostal fields (values of 0.6 to 0.7). The results also demonstrated that in the intercostal fields the major part of the blue‐green fluorescence was reabsorbed by chlorophylls and carotenoids. A partial reabsorption of the red fluorescence band near 690 nm by leaf chlorophyll took place, but did not affect the far‐red fluorescence band near F735. As a consequence the chlorophyll fluorescence ratio F690/F735 exhibited significantly higher values in the chlorophyll‐poor leaf vein regions (1.7 to 1.8) than in the chlorophyll‐rich intercostal fields (0.8 to 1.3). Imaging spectroscopy of leaves was shown to be much more precise than the screening of fluorescence signatures by conventional fluorometers. It clearly demonstrated that the blue‐green fluorescence and the red chlorophyll fluorescence of leaves exhibit an inverse contrast to each other. The advantage of the fluorescence imaging spectroscopy, which allows the simultaneous screening of the whole leaf surface and distinct parts of it, and its possible application in the detection of stress effects or local damage by insects and pathogens, is discussed.