Abstract

Seagrass meadows are important sites for carbon storage. Green turtles (Chelonia mydas) are marine megaherbivores that consume seagrass throughout much of their global range. With successful conservation efforts, turtle abundance will increase, leading to more meadows being returned to their natural grazed state. There is concern this may lead to a loss of carbon stored in these systems, but the effects of green turtle grazing on seagrass ecosystem carbon dynamics have not been investigated. Here we experimentally show that despite 79% lower net ecosystem production (NEP) following grazing (24.7 vs. 119.5 mmol C m−2 d−1) in a Caribbean Thalassia testudinum seagrass meadow, grazed areas maintained net positive metabolic carbon uptake. Additionally, grazing did not change the meadow production to respiration ratio, indicating it did not stimulate remineralization of sediment carbon stores. Compared to other published estimates of seagrass NEP (median: 20.6 mmol C m−2 d−1), NEP in grazed Caribbean T. testudinum meadows is similar to that in many other ungrazed systems. Our results demonstrate that while grazing does decrease potential future carbon sequestration as a result of lower NEP, it does not promote a metabolic release of current carbon stocks.

Highlights

  • IntroductionSeagrasses sequester large amounts of ‘blue carbon’—carbon buried by vegetated marine systems—each year through high rates of production and organic matter burial[2,3,4]

  • Seagrass meadows form some of the most productive ecosystems in the world[1]

  • Despite significantly lower rates of carbon uptake, our results show that tropical T. testudinum meadows remained active metabolic carbon sinks, even under long-term sustained grazing pressure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Seagrasses sequester large amounts of ‘blue carbon’—carbon buried by vegetated marine systems—each year through high rates of production and organic matter burial[2,3,4] The majority of this carbon is stored belowground in the sediments, where anoxic conditions can result in storage for millennia[5]. We hypothesized that: (1) metabolic carbon uptake rates (net ecosystem production) would be lower in grazed compared to ungrazed areas as a result of reduced aboveground biomass, and (2) carbon remineralization rates (ecosystem respiration) would be proportionally higher in grazed than in ungrazed areas as a result of increased heterotrophic respiration due to aeration of surface sediments following removal of the seagrass canopy. To evaluate our measured rates and the effects of green turtle grazing in a broader geographical context, we compiled published estimates of seagrass ecosystem metabolism

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call