Abstract

The objective of this study is to determine if perioperative blood transfusions increase the risk of recurrence in stage IB cervical cancer. Medical records from all patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (RH + PLND) at the University of Iowa and the University of Nebraska from 1978 to 1990 were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included patient age, body mass index (BMI), tumor size, cell type, depth of cervical invasion (DOI), presence of capillary-lymphatic space involvement (CLSI), lymph node metastasis, operating time, estimated blood loss, transfusion, and follow-up data. Three hundred two patients underwent RH + PLND. Transfusions were given to 244 (81%), with a mean of 2.6 units (range 1-18 units). Median follow-up was 49.5 months (range 9-190 months). Twenty patients (6.6%) had pelvic nodal metastasis. There were no periaortic nodal metastases in the 101 patients who had periaortic nodes dissected. There were no significant differences between the transfused and nontransfused groups, with respect to age, BMI, DOI, or pelvic node metastasis. Transfused patients differed significantly from the nontransfused in that they had larger tumors (P = 0.047), more frequent CLSI (P = 0.013), longer procedures (P = 0.02), and greater estimated blood loss (P < 0.0001). Recurrences developed in 29 patients (19 pelvic, 7 lung, 3 bone). There is no difference in disease-free survival (DFS) or calculated projected survival between the transfused and nontransfused groups. Pelvic node metastasis and tumor size were independent poor prognosticators. After controlling for these factors, the number of blood transfusions was not predictive of recurrence or survival. Perioperative transfusions do not increase the risk of recurrence in patients with cervical cancer.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call