Abstract

Background: Whether blood pressure (BP) changes have a different impact on short- and long-term outcomes of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate and compare the effects of BP changes on short- and long-term outcomes of MACE. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study, which consisted of four examinations: baseline, 2008, 2010, and 2017 follow-up. BP changes were measured from baseline to 2008, short- and long-term outcomes were defined by incident events occurred from 2008 to 2010 and 2008 to 2017, respectively. The final analysis was restricted to 24,495 and 27,522 participants in short- and long-term analysis. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). The difference of β coefficients between short- and long-term outcomes were examined using Fisher Z test. Findings: During a median follow-up of 12·5-years, 451 (216 stroke, 33 myocardial infarction, 219 CVD deaths) and 2,025 (1,532 stroke, 371 myocardial infarction, 991 CVD deaths) MACE were identified during short- and longterms, respectively. For prehypertension to hypertension, the HR (95% CI) were 1·36 (1·00-1·84) for short-term MACE, 1·19 (1·01-1·40) for long-term stroke. For hypertension to prehypertension, 0·66 (0·49-0·91) for short-term MACE, 0·46 (0·27-0·78) for short-term stroke, 0·82 (0·69-0·97) for long-term stroke. Furthermore, short-term outcomes conferred a stronger impact than long-terms (measured as β coefficients, all P<0·05). Interpretation: BP changes were significantly associated with MACE and its subtypes for the short- and long-terms, and short-term outcomes conferred a strong impact than long-terms. Funding Statement: This research was partly supported by funds from National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 81773510), Nature Science Foundation of Liaoning Province (No. 20170541048), National Key R&D Program of China (Grant #2017YFC1307600), and National Key R&D Program of China (Grant #2018YFC1311600). Declaration of Interests: The authors state: none. Ethics Approval Statement: The research protocol was approved by the China Medical University Research Ethics Committee, and written informed consent was formally obtained from all the participants or their guardians

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.