Abstract

Objectives Bleeding is the most common complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Injudicious transfusion is frequently performed in current practice, even though it is not always needed. This study aimed to identify the predictive factors of blood loss in the PCNL procedure and evaluate the perioperative transfusion practice. Methods A prospective study of PCNL was randomly performed by two consultants of endo-urology at our institution. The inclusion criteria were adults with kidney pelvic stones >20 mm or stone in inferior calyx >10 mm or staghorn stone. Those with coagulopathy, under anti-coagulant treatment or open conversion were excluded. A full blood count was taken at baseline and during 12, 24, 36, 72-hours post-operatively. Factors such as stone burden, sex, body surface area, shifting of hematocrit level and amount of blood transfused were analyzed statistically using line regression to identify the predictive factors of total blood loss (TBL). Results Eighty-five patients were enrolled in this study. Mean TBL was 560.92 ± 428.43 mL for both endo-urology surgeons. Stone burden was the most influential factor for TBL (p=0.037). Our results revealed that TBL (mL) = -153.379 + 0.229 × stone burden (mm2) + 0.203 x baseline serum hematocrit (%); thus considerably predicted the need for blood transfusion. A total of 87.1% patients did not receive perioperative transfusion, 3.5% received intra-operative transfusion, 7.1% received post-operative transfusion, 23% had both intra and post-operative transfusion, resulting in a cross-matched transfusion ratio of 7.72. Mean perioperative blood transfused was 356.00 ± 145.88 mL.

Highlights

  • Kidney stones prove to be a common affliction in many countries worldwide because of high incidence and prevalence

  • Our results revealed that total blood loss (TBL) = -153.379 + 0.229 × stone burden + 0.203 x baseline serum hematocrit (%); considerably predicted the need for blood transfusion

  • A total of 85 percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures were performed on 85 patients (46 males, 39 females) who completed this study, gave statistical power of 0.8

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Kidney stones prove to be a common affliction in many countries worldwide because of high incidence and prevalence. In America, kidney stone incidence was found in 116 out of 100,000 individuals[1]. A higher incidence was discovered in the German population aged 14 years and older, amounting to 720 out of 100,000 individuals[2]. An excessively high number of cases was found in Asian countries, namely, 114.3 per 100,000 in Japan, while Iranian urolithiasis incidence was assessed at 145.1 in 20053. A global increase in kidney stone cases was determined in individuals of all ages, sex, and races[4]. In our institution we have, to date, treated an increasing number of kidney stone patients, from 182 in 1997 to 847 in 20025

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.