Abstract
Background/Objectives: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is often followed by significant muscle atrophy and subsequent loss of strength. Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) has recently emerged as a potential mode of rehabilitation to mitigate these effects. The goal of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of BFRT in functional recovery when compared to traditional rehabilitation methods. Methods: A literature review was conducted across July and August 2024 using multiple databases that reported randomised controlled trials comparing BFRT to traditional rehabilitation methods. Primary outcomes were changes to thigh muscle mass and knee extensor/flexor strength with secondary outcomes consisting of patient-reported functional measures (IKDC and Lysholm scores). The RoB-2 tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria; however, substantial heterogeneity prevented a meta-analysis being conducted for the primary outcomes. Three out of the five studies measuring muscle mass reported significant (p < 0.05) findings favouring BFRT. There was variation amongst the strength improvements, but BFRT was generally favoured over the control. Meta analysis of the secondary outcomes showed significant improvements (p < 0.05) favouring BFRT despite moderate heterogeneity. Conclusions: BFRT shows promise for maintaining muscle mass and improving patient reported outcomes following ACL reconstruction. However, the high risk of bias limits the strength of these conclusions. Further high-quality research needs to be conducted to establish optimal BFRT protocols for this cohort and to determine if BFRT has a place in ACL rehabilitation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.