Abstract
Brain plasticity is a key mechanism for learning and recovery. A striking example of plasticity in the adult brain occurs following input loss, for example, following amputation, whereby the deprived zone is “invaded” by new representations. Although it has long been assumed that such reorganization leads to functional benefits for the invading representation, the behavioral evidence is controversial. Here, we investigate whether a temporary period of somatosensory input loss to one finger, induced by anesthetic block, is sufficient to cause improvements in touch perception (“direct” effects of deafferentation). Further, we determine whether this deprivation can improve touch perception by enhancing sensory learning processes, for example, by training (“interactive” effects). Importantly, we explore whether direct and interactive effects of deprivation are dissociable by directly comparing their effects on touch perception. Using psychophysical thresholds, we found brief deprivation alone caused improvements in tactile perception of a finger adjacent to the blocked finger but not to non-neighboring fingers. Two additional groups underwent minimal tactile training to one finger either during anesthetic block of the neighboring finger or a sham block with saline. Deprivation significantly enhanced the effects of tactile perceptual training, causing greater learning transfer compared with sham block. That is, following deafferentation and training, learning gains were seen in fingers normally outside the boundaries of topographic transfer of tactile perceptual learning. Our results demonstrate that sensory deprivation can improve perceptual abilities, both directly and interactively, when combined with sensory learning. This dissociation provides novel opportunities for future clinical interventions to improve sensation.
Highlights
Brain plasticity is a key mechanism for learning and recovery
Columns A and B contain analyses presented for the trained groups, (A) for all six fingers and three sessions, revealing a difference in the way thresholds change over session for the fingers; and (B) hypothesis-driven follow-up tests between the left index/ring of the Block ϩ Train vs. Sham ϩ Train groups, which indicate a significant group effect in the offline (Bi) but not long-term retention sessions (Bii; see in-text for direction of group main effect and its interpretation)
It is widely supported that sensory input loss causes changes in brain organization
Summary
Brain plasticity is a key mechanism for learning and recovery. A striking example of plasticity in the adult brain occurs following input loss, for example, following amputation, whereby the deprived zone is “invaded” by new representations. We determine whether this deprivation can improve touch perception by enhancing sensory learning processes, for example, by training (“interactive” effects). Deprivation significantly enhanced the effects of tactile perceptual training, causing greater learning transfer compared with sham block. Our results demonstrate that sensory deprivation can improve perceptual abilities, both directly and interactively, when combined with sensory learning This dissociation provides novel opportunities for future clinical interventions to improve sensation. Harriet Dempsey-Jones, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, and the Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford; Andreas C. It is commonly assumed that the invading representations can directly benefit from the freed-up cortical territory, leading to functional advantages for perception and action (Bottari, Nava, Ley, & Pavani, 2010; Merabet & Pascual-Leone, 2010; Nava & Röder, 2011)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.