Abstract

AbstractThe objective of this paper is to clarify a frequent confusion that occurs with synthetic multifunctional pores: does molecular recognition by a synthetic pore exclude molecular translocation through the same pore? Evidence that this is not the case is provided with a set of competitive experiments using a rigid‐rod β‐barrel with internal histidine–arginine dyads as synthetic multifunctional pores (SMPs) as well as 8‐hydroxypyrene‐1,3,6‐trisulfonate (HPTS) as a fluorescent and 1,3,6,8‐pyrenetetrasulfonate (PTS) as a non‐fluorescent blocker. Direct evidence for the efflux of HPTS blockers through blocked SMPs is obtained by quenching of released HPTS with an externally added quencher. Blockage of blocker efflux through blocked pores was demonstrated by adding PTS as the opposing external blocker (KD = 3.3 μM). A Hill coefficient of n = 1.5 may indicate that binding of more than one PTS blocker is necessary to inhibit the efflux of HPTS blockers. Supported by structural information on blockage and selectivity from biological potassium channels, blocker efflux through blocked pores is discussed as being implicated in selectivity. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.