Blinded, two-laboratory comparative analysis of Escherichia coli heat-stable enterotoxin production by using monoclonal antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, radioimmunoassay, suckling mouse assay, and gene probes.

Abstract

Heat-stable enterotoxin (ST)-producing enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) can be identified by a variety of assays, including the suckling mouse assay (SMA), radioimmunoassay (RIA), polyclonal or monoclonal antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and DNA hybridization with STh and STp gene probes. To compare the sensitivity and reliability of these assays, 100 coded ETEC and non-ETEC isolates were blindly tested in two independent laboratories. SMA, RIA, and monoclonal ELISA were performed in Cincinnati, Ohio, while gene probe analysis was performed in Baltimore, Md. The method of storage of organisms had a profound effect on the stability of plasmids in certain strains. Hybridization experiments to determine the presence or absence of the enterotoxin gene showed that strains stored on Dorset egg medium at room temperature better retained their plasmids than strains stored frozen in skim milk. Forty-four of the 100 organisms obtained from the skim milk stock were found to produce STa in liquid culture by the RIA, SMA, and monoclonal ELISA (100% agreement). However, 50 of 54 of the strains stored on Dorset egg medium which were originally classified as STa+ or ST+ LT+ (positive for both heat-stable and heat-labile [LT] enterotoxins) were found to produce STa and retain the plasmid by each of these assays. Three additional strains were found which harbored the plasmid but did not elaborate STa by any of the assays (3% discrepancy). The monoclonal antibody ELISA appears to be highly reliable for determination of STa production by ETEC and can be easily scored visually even by untrained personnel. Furthermore, when this STa assay is coupled with a polyclonal antibody assay, it is possible to predict the genotype of STh- and STp-producing organisms.