Abstract
Ambition is theorized to motivate many types of political behavior. However, as a motivation for federal judges, ambition has been largely ignored. Scholars have dismissed the possible influence of ambition by citing the low probability of receiving a promotion to a higher bench. Although a promotion is unlikely, judges may place substantial value on being promoted. Using a measure designed to capture a judge's promotion potential, I investigate the possibility that ambition exerts an independent effect on judicial behavior. The results demonstrate that court of appeals judges alter their behavior in a manner consistent with attempting to secure a seat on the United States Supreme Court.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
