Abstract

Objective: To compare the results of external levator resection in the upper eyelid blepharoptosis patients who have moderate and good levator function (LF). Material and Methods: This is a prospective study of 57 patients who had undergone levator resection from January 2015 to May 2016. LF was graded before surgery as moderate (5-10 mm) and good (10-15 mm) on the basis of the eyelid excursion. Preoperative and postoperative detailed information including age, gender, etiology, side, marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD1) change, operating time, cosmetic outcome and reoperations were recorded. Postoperative measurements at the 6th month visit was used for comparison. Results: The patient group consisted of 24 females (42.1%), 33 males (57.9%) with a mean age of 46.33 (range:7-79) years. Of the surgical procedures 77.1% (44/57) had good LF, 22.9% (13/57) had moderate LF. The age of the patients who had good LF was statistically significantly lower than the patients who had moderate LF (p=0.020). The operation time for the patients with good LF was statistically significantly lower than the patients who had moderate LF (p=0.001). MRD1 change and reoperation rate between two groups were not statistically significant (p>0.05). For the good LF patients, the final cosmetic outcome was statistically significantly good (p=0,012). Conclusion: For the blepharoptosis patients with good LF, the operation time is shorter and the final cosmetic outcome is better than the moderate LF blepharoptosis patients. As a conclusion, this study figured out the relevance of the preoperative assessment of LF in planning the surgical strategy for the treatment of blepharoptosis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.