Abstract

Abstract Background The combined use of antiplatelet agents (APT) and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patient with atrial fibrillation (AF) is commonly encountered in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between combination therapy (NOAC and APT) and monotherapy (NOAC only). Methods and results We analyzed patients who were prescribed NOACs between January 2012 and December 2016. The primary outcome was major or any bleeding events and the secondary outcomes were stroke/systemic embolism (SE) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Of 1,068 participants, there were 264 (24.7%) patients in the combination group. The prevalence of diabetes (p=0.017) and history of stroke and transient ischemic attacks (p<0.001) was higher in the combination group than in the monotherapy group. During the mean 14.6±9.8 months of follow-up, the incidence of any bleeding was significantly higher in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (p<0.001). Major bleeding, stroke/SE, and MACE between the two groups were similar. The rate of under-dosage NOACs prescriptions was higher in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (p=0.024). Conclusions The combination therapy had higher incidences of any bleeding events compared to the monotherapy. However, there was no difference in stroke/SE and MACE. The bleeding risk in patients taking the combination of NOACs and APT should be carefully evaluated. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1. Primary and secondary outcomes

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call