Abstract
The paper targets in establishing the potential of Bland-Altman analysis integrated with geospatial approach in habitat suitability ecological studies for species conservation. Assessing agreement between two measurement methods can be done by using Bland-Altman plots and calculating limits of agreement and hence compares two assay methods. This method is tried in this study for evaluating suitable habitats for tiger. The study incorporates Geographic Information System – Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (GIS-MCDA) using different uncertainty levels in Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) for tiger habitat suitability. Crisp AHP (CAHP) and fuzzy AHP (FAHP) methods are used for assigning weights to the major parameters responsible. The range for the limits of agreement shows FAHP Triangular method to be better than the rest when compared to CAHP method. Simultaneously, it proves that fuzzy is a better alternative than crisp AHP for this study. Keywords: Tiger Habitat Suitability, AHP, MCDA, Bland-Altman, ANOVA
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
