Bladder volume variation in hypofractionated prostate radiotherapy.

Abstract

234 Background: A full bladder for prostate radiotherapy treatment limits overall dose to the bladder and displaces bowel from high dose regions. There is currently no clear consensus on optimum bladder volume for prostate radiotherapy. Inconsistent bladder volumes can cause dosimetric uncertainty, distress, treatment delay and negative toxicity outcomes for patients. To identify potential ways to improve bladder filling consistency we retrospectively analysed bladder volume variation over the course of patients’ treatment and its relationship to various patient and treatment factors. Methods: We included all patients treated with 60gy in 20 fractions to the prostate only over a 1-year period. Standard fractionation, palliative, post-operative, and whole pelvis treatment regimens were excluded from our study. Patient, tumour, and treatment characteristics were collected retrospectively. We recorded patient reported IPSS scores that were completed pre and post treatment. Daily bladder volumes were recorded from cone beam CT (CBCT) retrospectively for a subset of 34 patients and included in correlative analyses with various treatment and patient factors. Results: 69 men were included in this study with a mean planning CT bladder volume of 272ml (79-574). Patients were divided into large ( > 180ml) and small subgroups (N = 46 vs 23). Smaller bladders resulted in a greater post treatment IPSS score (10.2 vs 7.7 (p = 0.2)) and greater change in IPSS (+3.3 vs +1.4 (p = 0.23). The variation of daily bladder volumes as measured by the standard deviation was positively associated with planning CT volume (p < 0.05), variation in daily treatment time (p < 0.05) and urinary symptoms (p = 0.29). Greater discordances between planning CT time and mean radiotherapy time resulted in a greater average difference between CBCT bladder volume and planning CT volume (p = 0.16). There were no appreciable seasonal or diurnal associations for all recorded bladder volumes. Conclusions: Smaller bladder volumes at planning CT are associated with increased urinary symptoms whereas larger volumes undergo more daily variation. This data suggests an optimal planning bladder volume of 200-400ml to minimise on treatment variation. This is the first study to demonstrate a relationship between variation in daily treatment times and daily bladder variation. Synchronisation of planning CT time with patient treatment time preference will enable patients to better replicate planning CT bladder volumes. This, along with several other areas for improvement highlighted by this study have formed the basis for a prospective single centre pilot study.