Abstract

Cesarean section is the most common surgery performed in the United States with over 30% of deliveries occurring via this route. This number is likely to increase given decreasing rates of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) and primary cesarean delivery on maternal request, which carries the inherent risk for intraoperative complications. Urologic injury is the most common injury at the time of either obstetric or gynecologic surgery, with the bladder being the most frequent organ damaged. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean section include previous cesarean delivery, adhesions, emergent cesarean delivery, and cesarean section performed at the time of the second stage of labor. Fortunately, most bladder injuries are recognized at the time of surgery, which is important, as quick recognition and repair are associated with a significant reduction in patient mortality. Although cesarean delivery is a cornerstone of obstetrics, there is a paucity of data in the literature either supporting or refuting specific techniques that are performed today. There is evidence to support double-layer closure of the hysterotomy, the routine use of adhesive barriers, and performing a Pfannenstiel skin incision versus a vertical midline subumbilical incision to decrease the risk for bladder injury during cesarean section. There is also no evidence that supports the creation of a bladder flap, although routinely performed during cesarean section, as a method to reduce the risk of bladder injury. Finally, more research is needed to determine if indwelling catheterization, exteriorization of the uterus, and methods to extend hysterotomy incision lead to bladder injury.

Highlights

  • The etiology of the term “cesarean” is unclear

  • One myth suggests that Julius Caesar himself was delivered via this route, which is unlikely, as his mother was alive after his birth, and during that time surgical delivery was only performed if a mother was dying or deceased

  • When comparing Pfannenstiel incision to vertical midline subumbilical incision, this study demonstrated that vertical midline subumbilical incision had a significantly higher risk for bladder injury (P < .0001, Odds Ratio (OR) 6.7, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) 2.6–16.5) [47]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The etiology of the term “cesarean” is unclear. One myth suggests that Julius Caesar himself was delivered via this route, which is unlikely, as his mother was alive after his birth, and during that time surgical delivery was only performed if a mother was dying or deceased. 60% of patients with bladder injury were found to have adhesions at the time of repeat cesarean delivery versus the 10% of controls.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.