Abstract

AbstractWildlife-based tourism poses opportunities and challenges for species conservation. Minimizing potential negative impacts of tourism is critical to ensure business and conservation enterprises can coexist. In north-western Namibia tourism is used as a conservation tool for the Critically Endangered black rhinocerosDiceros bicornis. However, black rhinoceroses are susceptible to human disturbance and may become displaced by tourist activities, which threatens not only the security and health of the rhinoceros population but also the sustainability of the business. We examined areas avoided by black rhinoceroses to understand how they respond to the type and extent of tourism development, and to evaluate management alternatives. We used spatial data on use of water sources by rhinoceroses to create a series of a priori candidate models that described the negative influences of tourist activities on rhinoceros habitat use. A model selection approach strongly supported a cumulative zones of influence model comprised of a 6 km buffer around the airstrip combined with a 1 km buffer around roads used daily. We compared alternative management scenarios using the best-performing model and found that an optimal road-use policy combined with airstrip relocation could minimize the total area avoided by the black rhinoceros to 7.1% and loss of high quality habitat to 20.7%. Under the worst-case scenario the area avoided and loss of high quality habitat were 153 and 85% greater, respectively, than under the scenario with optimal management. Our findings provide a novel framework and a practical, policy-relevant decision support tool to improve the contribution of tourism to wildlife conservation.

Highlights

  • Wildlife-based tourism has been described as a key conservation mechanism (Buckley & Castley, ; Coghlan et al, ; Buckley et al, ) and has increased globally (Tapper, ), in developing countries (Balmford et al, )

  • Our findings suggest that the black rhinoceros will tolerate limited levels of tourism activity but will avoid areas under chronic tourism-induced disturbance

  • Similar results have been documented for other sensitive species such as wild reindeer Rangifer tarandus tarandus (Nellemann et al, ) and mountain goats Oreamnos americanus (Richard & Côté, ), and can be extended to mountain woodland caribou Rangifer tarandus caribou (Polfus et al, ), barren-ground caribou Rangifer tarandus groelandicus, brown bears and grey wolves Canis lupus (Johnson et al, ) when mining activities are included

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Wildlife-based tourism has been described as a key conservation mechanism (Buckley & Castley, ; Coghlan et al, ; Buckley et al, ) and has increased globally (Tapper, ), in developing countries (Balmford et al, ). Such tourism can have negative consequences for the wildlife intended to benefit from it.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.