Abstract

We introduce bimonads in a 2-category K and define biwreaths as bimonads in the 2-category bEM(K) of bimonads, in the analogous fashion as Lack and Street defined wreaths. A biwreath is then a system containing a wreath, a cowreath and their mixed versions, but also a 2-cell λ in bEM(K) governing the compatibility of the monad and the comonad structure of the biwreath. We deduce that the monad laws encode 2-(co)cycles and the comonad laws so called 3-(co)cycles, while the 2-cell conditions of the (co)monad structure 2-cells of the biwreath encode (co)actions twisted by these 2- and 3-(co)cycles. The compatibilities of λ deliver concrete expressions of the latter structure 2-cells. We concentrate on the examples of biwreaths in the 2-category induced by a braided monoidal category C and take for the distributive laws in a biwreath the braidings of the different categories of Yetter–Drinfel'd modules in C. We prove that the before-mentioned properties of a biwreath specified to the latter setting recover on the level of C different algebraic constructions known in the category MR of modules over a commutative ring R, such as Radford biproduct, Sweedler's crossed product algebra, comodule algebras over a quasi-bialgebra and the Drinfel'd twist. In this way we obtain that the known examples of (mixed) wreaths coming from MR are not merely examples, rather they are consequences of the structure of a biwreath, and that the form of their structure morphisms originates in the laws inside of a biwreath. Choosing different distributive laws and different 2-cells λ in a biwreath, leads to different and possibly new algebraic constructions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call