Bivalirudin versus heparin during coronary angioplasty for unstable or postinfarction angina: Final report reanalysis of the Bivalirudin Angioplasty Study

Abstract

Background This study was a reanalysis of the Bivalirudin Angioplasty Study, which compared bivalirudin with high-dose heparin during coronary angioplasty for unstable angina. Methods Differences in rates of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization were compared at 7, 90, and 180 days after angioplasty with intention-to-treat analysis. Results The combined end point occurred in 135 of 2161 patients (6.2%) in the bivalirudin group and in 169 of 2151 patients (7.9%) in the heparin group at 7 days (P = .039). Differences persisted between the groups at 90 days (P = .012) and 180 days (P = .153). Bleeding occurred in 76 patients (3.5%) in the bivalirudin group versus 199 (9.3%) in the heparin group (P < .001). Conclusions This analysis supports the hypothesis that bivalirudin reduces ischemic complications and bleeding after angioplasty. Further trials are needed to evaluate bivalirudin versus heparin in conjunction with platelet-glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and for coronary stenting. (Am Heart J 2001;142:952-9.)