Bitter sweet: Reflections on the training therapy experience

Abstract

The training therapy experience has been a subject of interest and controversy since the time of Freud and his own self-analysis. This study explored therapists’ experiences of the training therapy to see if there are any differences compared to a non-training therapy. Methodology: An online survey was used together with a convenience sample of five semi-structured interviews. Data was analysed using simple descriptive statistics and thematic analysis.Findings:The results suggest three significant benefits and one drawback. The benefits relate to being in the client role; support alongside clinical work and a model of apprenticeship. The drawback is a concern with confidentiality. This concern can hinder the working through of both positive and negative transferences for fear of the impact on the training and future career of the trainee.Discussion:The disadvantage stems from the perennial power imbalance in the therapeutic dyad. This is exacerbated for trainees who may have to experience short–term turbulence for long–term functioning and stability as a practitioner.Recommendations:Further research is proposed regarding training analysts, and how the power imbalance of the therapeutic dyad can affect their work with candidates. Additionally, the benefits of personal therapy, which can deepen clinical work, are recommended for all those working in mental health.